Infrared Rejection

Window Films are capable of rejecting Infrared (IR) but oftentimes this can be mistaken for Total Solar Energy Rejection. Improperly educated window film dealers, crafty marketing on the part of manufactures, and a lack of standardized testing can propagate misinformation leading a consumer to conclude that a window film will reject up to 98% of the heat! This just isn’t true at all. Let’s take a few paragraphs and learn what infrared is, why it is listed on some specification cards, and how IR rejection should be interpreted.

Infrared –What is it?

Energy created by the sun travels to earth in different wavelengths. These wavelengths make up what is known as the “Electro Magnetic Spectrum” or EM spectrum for our acronym dependent crowd out there. The diagram above illustrates how differing wavelengths affect us in different ways. When it comes to our windows and energy control we are affected primarily by what is known as the “Solar Spectrum” which is a band of frequencies made up of Ultra Violet, Visible, and Infrared wavelengths. These three areas are responsible for what we feel as heat and the total solar energy that results from solar spectrum can be regulated by window film.

The chart above shows that energy is distributed across the solar spectrum in 3 distinct bands. Infrared frequencies extend from 780 to 2500nm and beyond. 53% of the sun’s energy comes to us in this band whereas 44% of the sun’s energy is in the form of visible light and 3% in the form of UV radiation. (Note: See Updated Understanding of Energy Distribution Across the Solar Spectrum.) As you can see infrared radiation is a band of electromagnetic wavelengths that account for 53% of the sun’s energy. Clearly, this band cannot be interpreted as Total Solar Energy (Heat) nor can it be used as a total performance specification to differentiate one window film’s ability to regulate the total amount of energy that enters through glass over another film. So why do some manufacturers publish this specification in their literature?

Why List IR Rejection Percentages?

We mentioned earlier how window film can be designed to regulate these three bands of the Solar Spectrum. Certain materials that have spectrally selective properties can be incorporated into film substrates. There is one family of films that primarily focuses on IR rejection while allowing more of the visible light to transmit through the film. These films are sometimes referred to as Spectrally Select Window Films because they regulate specific wavelengths of the EM spectrum. With the advent of Spectrally Select Films eventually came the justification to list the performance of the primary regulated band in the solar spectrum namely, the infrared rejection. As a result, you will find some manufacturers listing their product’s IR rejection in varying percentages.

How Should IR be Interpreted?

Even if these specifications came about with the most noble of intentions, the reality is that IR rejection specifications can certainly be capitalized on with a little crafty marketing or simply from a salesperson that lacks the proper training and education. If we simply keep in mind that any given IR rejection percentage is simply telling you that the film is rejecting xx% of the IR band which makes up 53% of the total solar energy then it becomes easy to interpret performance in the context it belongs in.
One note of caution must be mentioned. Marketing departments can report IR rejection any way that they want because there has never been an industry standard for reporting IR rejection. One strategy for reporting extraordinarily high IR rejection numbers is to sample specific wavelengths in the IR band and report rejection. For example, a film’s specification card may say that it rejects 97% of the IR. Wow that is amazing! Or so it looks that way, however when you do some further investigation you find that they are only reporting this IR rejection percentage between 900-1000nm. Is that the entire near IR band which extends from at least 780-2500nm? Hardly! So is this film really rejecting 97% of the IR? No, it is actually closer to 86% when you average it out over 780-2500nm. We will go into more detail in future articles but suffice it to say, buyer beware. Standardized performance measurements such as the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) which is recognized by the NFRC the only non-profit independent rating agency for window and applied film performance is a much more accurate total performance specification that can be relied upon to compare one film’s performance to another film. Fortunately, there are many well-trained professionals in the window film industry that can help you to find the right product for your needs but it certainly does not hurt to do a little research and educate yourself along the way.

7 Responses to “Infrared Rejection”

  1. 1 Dexter Kinsley July 4, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    Nice write up, but I’d like to add a couple of points if I may.

    The mention of a solar film maker reporting 97% infrared rejection with further investigation leading to that particular percentage falling between 900-1000nm on the EMS says nothing of the fact that mid-point at 950nm has one of the lowest frequency intensities in solar energy.

    Looking at the chart itself the peaks found within 780 & 1800nm range spike the highest, therefore, the peak point is where the most intense infrared energy can be found. If I were a savvy marketer wanting to capitalize on infrared rejection reporting, I would choose one of these more intense frequencies. Certainly not 950, 1320-ish or 1750-ish nanometers.

    Also, there is currently a study being conducted that may change the percentage of UV, VLT and IR values responsible for solar energy that leads to ‘heat’. The 53 infrared, 44 visible light and 3 ultraviolet are not as accurate as thought to be when first conceived in the early days of solar control film. Stay tuned.

    You may want to correct your 43% VLT in the text just below the EMS chart.

  2. 2 vclimber July 4, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Thanks Dexter, I like the way you think! The intensity across the IR band is not uniform and keep in mind that industry typically limits this calculation to Near Infrared (NIR)780-2500nm. The entire IR spectrum extends much farther, in fact, I don’t think there is a firm conclusion on where the FIR ends. So it is an extremely unreliable specification to say the least.

    This underscores the need in the industry for uniform, accurate, and reliable testing of products. The Solar Heat Gain Coefficient(SHGC) has been used in the glass industry for years. It is a much more accurate measurement than IR rejection and we are pleased to see that the NFRC has Certified films from two manufactures. Hopefully, the rest of the industry will jump on board.

    Thanks for the correction. I want to always be accurate but I’m not perfect so I appreciate the eyes and ears of others. You seem to have some education in this field… if you ever want to submit and article yourself, contact Window Film Online.


  3. 3 dexter kingsley July 14, 2008 at 7:57 am

    Write an article myself? There are far greater voices in our industry, I need not place myself among them.

    After all, it’s difficult enough keeping a small voice in places such as a simple(ton)’s dictatorial message board slanted to constant and repetitive misinformation.

    But thanks for asking.

  4. 4 vclimber July 15, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Very humble of you Dexter, I understand. If you happen to see any of those greater voices please relay my appreciation for their creating teaching tools such as the 2nd illustrative graph in this article.

  5. 5 Phillip July 27, 2008 at 4:25 pm


    Great write up & good information. Thanks,

  6. 6 dexter kingsley August 8, 2008 at 8:04 am


    Check out LLumar’s recent Tech Update Newsletter! The infrared write up is absolutely impressive in(deed). It also points out the possibility of the above chart being moot, based on present day findings.


  7. 7 vclimber August 8, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Thanks for the heads-up Dexter. I read the article and you will find a blog on this site about it right here:

    I have another blog in the works commenting on the implications of these findings… can’t seem to find the time to get it finished though.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: