<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IR Rejection Part2 –The Slight of Bandwidth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/</link>
	<description>The Best View In Window Film®</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fapitalty</title>
		<link>http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Fapitalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 07:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Kinsley</title>
		<link>http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Kinsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-22</guid>
		<description>No, Thank you for clearing this up! For the life of me I could not wrap my head around the precise points where UVC &amp; UVB are found in respect to the 300nm start point you had given.

I just believed it was important to address the entire UV portion so those that have knowledge of the EMS, but not solar films, would come away from your reading a bit less perplexed.

dext</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Thank you for clearing this up! For the life of me I could not wrap my head around the precise points where UVC &amp; UVB are found in respect to the 300nm start point you had given.</p>
<p>I just believed it was important to address the entire UV portion so those that have knowledge of the EMS, but not solar films, would come away from your reading a bit less perplexed.</p>
<p>dext</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vclimber</title>
		<link>http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>vclimber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Thanks, another good comment!

Let me just address this part:

“Correction:
The solar spectrum begins at ‘0′. 300nm is in the UVA band leading downward through UVB and UVC until arriving at 0.”

Yes it does Dexter, but when we are dealing with film we only deal with the wavelengths that reach the earth’s surface. So when we factor in the atmosphere that blocks the smaller wavelengths, the UVC band (100-280nm) and glass that blocks almost all the UVB (280-320nm)that leaves us at about 300nm plus that actually transmits through glass. Thus when we test film we do not necessarily have to account for what is already filtered out by atmosphere and glass so therefore I did not account for it in this article. If I did though, someone would come along and probably tell me “why account for what is already filter out?” -lol

-vc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, another good comment!</p>
<p>Let me just address this part:</p>
<p>“Correction:<br />
The solar spectrum begins at ‘0′. 300nm is in the UVA band leading downward through UVB and UVC until arriving at 0.”</p>
<p>Yes it does Dexter, but when we are dealing with film we only deal with the wavelengths that reach the earth’s surface. So when we factor in the atmosphere that blocks the smaller wavelengths, the UVC band (100-280nm) and glass that blocks almost all the UVB (280-320nm)that leaves us at about 300nm plus that actually transmits through glass. Thus when we test film we do not necessarily have to account for what is already filtered out by atmosphere and glass so therefore I did not account for it in this article. If I did though, someone would come along and probably tell me “why account for what is already filter out?” -lol</p>
<p>-vc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Kinsley</title>
		<link>http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/ir-rejection-part2-%e2%80%93the-slight-of-bandwidth/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Kinsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windowfilmonline.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, heat lamps emit far more infrared than visible light when compared to the sun, so if a film selectively absorbs or blocks more infrared between 780 &amp; 1050nm, the BTU meter&#039;s reading will certainly be overstated and not representative of total solar energy rejected.

BTU meters measure all UV (granted UVA), visible light range and as mentioned only a small portion of the infrared band. It in no way compares to the accuracy found in lab photo spectrometers.

Quote &quot;No, the solar spectrum starts at around 300nm and extends past 2500nm.&quot; Unquote

Correction:
The solar spectrum begins at &#039;0&#039;. 300nm is in the UVA band leading downward through UVB and UVC until arriving at 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, heat lamps emit far more infrared than visible light when compared to the sun, so if a film selectively absorbs or blocks more infrared between 780 &amp; 1050nm, the BTU meter&#8217;s reading will certainly be overstated and not representative of total solar energy rejected.</p>
<p>BTU meters measure all UV (granted UVA), visible light range and as mentioned only a small portion of the infrared band. It in no way compares to the accuracy found in lab photo spectrometers.</p>
<p>Quote &#8220;No, the solar spectrum starts at around 300nm and extends past 2500nm.&#8221; Unquote</p>
<p>Correction:<br />
The solar spectrum begins at &#8216;0&#8242;. 300nm is in the UVA band leading downward through UVB and UVC until arriving at 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
